In that study, suppression of SWS, as compared with undisturbed sleep, significantly impaired the encoding of pictures, and this was associated with a significant decrease in hippocampal activation during encoding, whereas training of a finger sequence tapping skill, as in our study, was not influenced by manipulation of SWA. Thus, the results from these two studies are strikingly complementary, although the studies also differed to some extent in their approach and design. Here, we not only enhanced SWA through tSOS, rather than suppressing SWA through acoustic stimulation, but also modified SWA during a single sleep cycle of a nap, rather than during a Selleck Cobimetinib full night of sleep. Unlike

in the study of Van der Werf et al., the encoding period in our study took place immediately after sleep, and retrieval was tested after only a short delay, rather than after another night of sleep. Thus, our procedure enabled a more direct assessment of encoding quality (in the absence of any confounding effects of intervening sleep). Importantly, we show enhancing effects of tSOS-induced Pifithrin-�� in vitro SWA not only for the learning and subsequent recognition of pictures, but also for the free and cued recall of learnt verbal materials. Cued and free recall paradigms probe the hippocampal contribution to a memory representation, which basically relies on the forming of new associative connections, to a greater

extent than recognition (Tulving & Madigan, 1970; Squire et al., 2007). Thus, the mechanisms and brain regions mediating cued

or free recall and recognition differ. Whereas cued and free recall critically rely on a fine-tuned interaction between the prefrontal and hippocampal circuitry, hippocampal contributions to recognition performance are less essential (Mayes et al., 2002; Barbeau et al., 2005; Holdstock et al., 2005; Squire et al., 2007). Hence, our finding that tSOS-enhanced SWA improved the subjects’ ability to learn word pairs and word lists as assessed by cued and free recall C59 price is another strong hint that the benefit of SWA for encoding of information pertains in particular to the hippocampus-dependent declarative memory system. Along this line of reasoning, there is also evidence from studies in humans and rats that the effects of tSOS on word list learning observed here, indicating an increased susceptibility to proactive interference, likewise reflect basically improved encoding within the prefrontal–hippocampal circuitry (Han et al., 1998; Caplan et al., 2007; Malleret et al., 2010). Thus, rats with neurotoxic lesions to the hippocampus performed better than control rats on a configural learning task specifically when short intertrial intervals were used, because, in this condition, unlike in the controls, performance was not disturbed by proactively interfering response tendencies from the preceding trial (Han et al., 1998).