, 2008). Pseudomonas putida has two uvrA

genes: uvrA and uvrA2. Genetic studies of the effects of uvrA, uvrA2, uvrB and uvrC in mutagenic processes revealed that although all of these genes are responsible for the repair of UV-induced DNA damage in P. putida, uvrA plays a more important role in this process than uvrA2, because the effect of uvrA2 deletion appears only in the absence of uvrA (Tark et al., 2008). At the same time, the deletion of uvrB, uvrC or uvrA2 gene reduces the frequency of mutations in the absence of an exogenous source of DNA damage both in growing cells and in stationary-phase bacteria. Moreover, our results indicate that UvrA and UvrA2 have opposite roles in mutagenesis: while UvrA acts as a specificity factor to reduce mutations, UvrA2 facilitates the occurrence of mutations in P. putida. UvrA2 proteins can be found buy PR-171 in many different unrelated bacterial species and they all have a deletion of about 150 amino acids including the domain required for UvrB binding (Goosen & Moolenaar, 2008; Pakotiprapha et al., 2008). It has been suggested that UvrA2 proteins are rather involved in resistance to DNA intercalating drugs than in DNA repair (Goosen & Moolenaar, 2008). However, despite the lack of a UvrB-binding domain, there is evidence that UvrA2 proteins can confer tolerance to Selleck Bortezomib DNA damage

(Tanaka et al., 2005; Shen et al., 2007; Tark et al., 2008). Recent studies by Timmins et al. (2009) have revealed that UvrA2 from Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with UvrB, although the interaction is weak and transient. As already discussed above, differently from mutagenic NER observed in E. coli (Hori et al., 2007; Hasegawa et al., 2008), P. putida 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl UvrA does not

participate in mutagenic NER (Tark et al., 2008). In P. putida, this process is facilitated by UvrA2. The mechanism of how UvrA2 affects NER is not known. It is possible that weak interactions of UvrA2 with UvrB (and may be also interactions between UvrA and UvrA2) could modulate a switch from a classical error-correcting pathway to a mutagenic pathway. We also cannot exclude the possibility that some auxiliary factor(s) could enhance UvrA2 interactions with UvrB. Here, it is important to emphasize that under stressful conditions when the growth of bacteria is very slow or stopped and the amount of replication of the bacterial genome is minimal, bacteria can still mutate with a high frequency. Therefore, DNA repair synthesis occurring under stressful conditions might be an important source of mutagenesis. Notably, damage of DNA bases, if not repaired, and generation of AP sites due to limitation of AP-endonuclease may cause accumulation of DNA strand breaks. This, in turn, induces RecA and stimulates recombination processes. Recent studies with the E. coli model show that DNA synthesis occurring during recombinational repair can be error prone due to the involvement of DNA damage-induced specialized DNA polymerases.