0 has been reported to generally have moderate to moderate-high validity and reliability.29 Wodchis et al30 reported a high sensitivity of 0.80 for 6 of the 10 most-prevalent discharge diagnoses and moderate sensitivities in the range of 0.60 to 0.79 for another 12, including DVT. Kroegel and Reissig1 have noted the difficulty associated with establishing a VTE diagnosis, thus illustrating the limitations of comparing studies without adequate DNA Damage inhibitor consideration of the study methods used to determine VTE diagnosis. Finally, data for 5 of 25 VTE risk factors described by Zarowitz et al15

were not available in the current study database. These factors may also have had an independent association with occurrence of VTE. Further research should seek to test whether, as the possibility is suggested here, incidence rates of VTE during nursing home residence are increasing over time and whether such changes are related to changes in resident acuity or more widespread MDV3100 mouse usage of advanced diagnostics. Appropriateness of assessment and therapy, dichotomized by cases of VTE on nursing home admission or during residence,

should be evaluated in light of the high mortality risk linked to VTE. The authors acknowledge Matthew Romo, PharmD, of Chameleon Communications International Inc., who provided editorial support of the author-prepared manuscript with funding from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. “
“The authors wish to SPTLC1 correct Table 1 of their Original Study article: Kathryn A. Frahm, PhD, MSW, Lisa M. Brown, PhD, and Kathryn Hyer, PhD, MPP. Racial Disparities in End-of-Life Planning and Services for Deceased Nursing Home Residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc

2012;13(9):819.e7-819.e11. Table 1 was inaccurate in the presentation of research findings. However, all other data and findings presented in the article itself, as well as all other tables, were correct. Please see the corrected Table 1 below, which reflects the corrected findings. This table has been corrected online. “
“Current water quality benchmarks (guidelines in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand; criteria in the United States [US]) recognize that, in addition to the measured concentration of a substance of potential concern (SOPC), water quality conditions need to be taken into account when determining whether an SOPC will be toxic to aquatic organisms. In other words, it is not just the dose that makes the poison (Paracelsus, 1493–1541: “Alle Dinge sind Gift, und nichts ohne Gift; allein die Dosis macht, daß ein Ding kein Gift ist”), but the form of the dose that makes the poison. This reality was first formally recognized by the USEPA almost 30 years ago (Stephan et al., 1985), and subsequently used to develop national water quality criteria (USEPA, 1986 and subsequent criteria documents).