01) In contrast, comparing the effect of ATP depletion to that o

01). In contrast, comparing the effect of ATP depletion to that of BCRP inhibition ( Fig. 3B) showed that these two treatments caused similar changes to [3H]nifurtimox accumulation after 1, 2.5, 5 and 20 min, although it was noted that after 30 minutes ATP depletion caused a significantly greater increase (by 17–20%) in [3H]nifurtimox accumulation (p < 0.05). There

were no significant differences in [14C]sucrose accumulation between any treatments (data not shown). Probenecid (350 μM) was used to assess any initial contributions to [3H]nifurtimox and [14C]sucrose accumulation from proteins separate to P-gp and BCRP; namely multi-drug resistance associated click here proteins (MRP) 1 and 2, organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) and organic anion transporters (OATs) (Table 1). Fig. 4 illustrates

the time dependent effect of probenecid on [3H]nifurtimox accumulation. This was not matched by the presence of 10 μM indomethacin, where no significant change to [3H]nifurtimox was observed at any time point. Taurocholic acid (TCA, 200 μM) and para-aminohippuric acid (PAH, 500 μM) were then CH5424802 chemical structure used to assess function of OATPs and OATs respectively. The addition of TCA caused significant changes in [3H]nifurtimox accumulation from 2.5 min (p < 0.01) and onwards when all three time-points showed significant increases (p < 0.001 Fig. 3), albeit less than those observed with the BCRP inhibitors. PAH caused no significant differences in accumulation of [3H]nifurtimox at any time point. No significant differences in [14C]sucrose accumulation between any treatments were observed (data not shown). With

CTs becoming the treatments of choice for HAT, the effect of their addition to the accumulation buffer was observed on [3H]nifurtimox and [14C]sucrose accumulation. The accumulation of [3H]nifurtimox in the hCMEC/D3s was not significantly affected by unlabelled melarsoprol (30 μM), whereas unlabelled pentamidine (10 μM) caused an increase at 2.5 min (p < 0.01) and this was maintained onwards to 30 min (p < 0.001), in comparison to DMSO controls ( Fig. 5A). The effect cAMP of eflornithine (250 μM) and suramin (150 μM) on the accumulation of [3H]nifurtimox (without the presence of DMSO) saw no significant changes arise (Fig. 5B). There were no significant differences in [14C]sucrose accumulation between any of these treatments, or between DMSO and no DMSO controls (both [3H]nifurtimox and [14C]sucrose, data not shown). The potential of the compounds used in this study to cause cytotoxicity was assessed using an MTT assay and the effect compared to untreated control endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) (Fig. 6). There were no significant differences on cell viability after 30 minutes exposure to the drugs, except when using the positive control 1% Triton X-100 (p < 0.01).

Comments are closed.