One important area of uncertainty is whether the term CHE, which was introduced to expand MHE toward grade I of oriented patients, is informative and clinically valuable. This needs to be evaluated by a data-driven approach. Likewise, the distinction between isolated liver failure and ACLF-associated HE should be evaluated by independent data. A closer scientific collaboration between clinical hepatologists and dedicated brain researchers, including functional brain
imaging experts, is needed. Likewise, neuropsychologists and psychiatrists are needed to clarify the broad spectrum of neuropsychiatric symptoms that can be observed in patients with liver disease. Syndrome diagnoses should be more precisely classified and transformed into classifiable entities based on pathophysiology and responding to the requirements of clinical hepatology practice and research. Future studies should fill our gaps in knowledge. They should Alectinib nmr be focused on assessing the effects of HE on individuals and society, how to use diagnostic tools appropriately, and define the therapeutic goals in each clinical scenario (Table 7). 1. Studies on economic and social burden
among different societies 2. Studies on cultural aspects on therapy and compliance with treatment 3. Long-term natural history studies 1. Studies on clinically applicable high-sensitivity screening tests that can guide which patients may benefit from dedicated testing 2.
Development of algorithms to decide when and how to apply the diagnostic process 3. Studies on competing factors (i.e., BAY 73-4506 HCV, delirium, depression, and narcotic use on diagnosis) 4. Studies on biomarkers for presence and progression of neurological dysfunction 1. Studies on selecting who will benefit from preventing the first OHE episode 2. Studies for >6 months to evaluate compliance and continued effects on cognitive improvement 3. Develop protocols focused on how to diagnose and treat precipitating factors 4. Determine what should be the standard protocol to investigate new therapies 5. Decide which therapies have been adequately studied and are not a priority for additional studies The existing literature suffers from a lack Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II of standardization, and this heterogeneity makes pooling of data difficult or meaningless. Recommendations to promote consistency across the field have been published by ISHEN.[66] Following is a synopsis of the recommendations. Patients who are not expected to survive the hospitalization, who are terminally ill or have ACLF should be excluded. A detailed standard-of-care algorithm must be agreed upon a priori and must be instituted and monitored diligently throughout the trial. Patients should not be entered into trials until after the institution of optimal standard-of-care therapy and only if their mental state abnormalities persist.