The full impact of the vaccine on cervical abnormalities and cancer will not be seen until even later. Currently, the major determinant of cervical cancer risk in England is screening attendance [5]. Screening attendance is demographically patterned, with non-white women and those with less education and from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds being less likely ever to attend screening [6], [7], [8] and [9]. Other major risk factors for cervical cancer are having many sexual partners, due to an increased risk of HPV acquisition [10], and cigarette smoking [11], [12] and [13]. Smoking status is strongly related to SES [14] and

ethnicity [15]; and sexual behaviour also varies by ethnic group [16]. Associations between sexual behaviour and SES are less clear-cut [17] but Sirolimus solubility dmso women with academic qualifications and managerial/professional occupations are at lower odds of having intercourse before the

age of 16 [18]. There is emerging evidence that these risk factors for cervical cancer may also be related to HPV vaccination status. Non-white women are less likely check details to have been vaccinated than white women in the UK and elsewhere [19] and [20], and black ethnic groups are particularly unlikely to be vaccinated in the US [21]. The role of religion in vaccine initiation is less clear [21]. A social gradient in HPV vaccination uptake has been observed in the UK catch-up cohorts [22], but is less clear in the routine STK38 cohorts [23], [24] and [25]. In most cases HPV vaccination is offered some years before cervical screening and therefore few studies have examined the association between uptake

of HPV vaccination and cervical screening attendance. Studies in Australia [26] and Germany [27] that have explored this have found no significant association, but samples have been small and have tended to include older women who received the vaccine on an opportunistic basis. A larger study conducted as part of an evaluation of the immunisation programme in Scotland found higher intentions to attend future cervical screening in vaccinated girls [28], and a study in Wales found that unvaccinated women from the catch-up cohort were less likely to attend screening when invited at age 20 [29]; however no such research has yet been conducted in England. This study aimed to establish whether unvaccinated girls are likely to be at disproportionately higher risk of cervical cancer. We used data collected from vaccinated and unvaccinated girls in the first two cohorts of the HPV immunisation programme to consider the association between vaccine status and (i) demographic risk factors and (ii) behavioural risk factors for cervical cancer. Assuming that vaccine coverage (three doses) would be 77.