The primers used in the study have been described previously [17]. The amplified product was then analyzed on 2% agarose gel. Samples which did not react to any of G or P genotype specific primers were considered non-typeable. Of the Ipatasertib price 756 diarrheal specimens collected from two hospitals (AIIMS and KSCH), we found 290 (38.4%) positive for rotavirus. All 290 rotavirus positive

samples were subjected to both G and P genotyping. We observed genotype G9 most frequently circulating in Delhi with a prevalence rate of 25.2% followed by G1 and G2 at 22.4% and 17.2%, respectively (Table 1). The previously reported [17] fast emerging genotype G12 had an overall prevalence of 14.8% throughout the study period. However, http://www.selleckchem.com/products/INCB18424.html we seldom detected the G4 genotype (2.1%). Amongst the P genotypes, P[4] (25.5%) was most prevalent while P[6], P[8] and P[11] accounted for 20%, 16.9% and 2.1%, respectively (Table 1). Among the G–P combinations, we commonly detected 16 different rotavirus strains at varying frequencies. Among the globally common G–P combinations, G9P[8] was detected among 5.2% of the samples while both G1P[8] and G2P[4] showed 7.2% detection each. We detected 13 other unusual rotavirus strains of which, G12P[6] (10%), G9P[4] (6.5%) and G2P[6] (3.4%) were more frequent (Table

1). We also observed a high percentage of mixed infections: 6.9% of G mix and 14.5% of P mix. Besides mixed infections, nearly 11% and 21% of the total RV positives could not be G and P genotyped, respectively. At AIIMS, we found 35.9% (184/513) of samples positive for rotavirus antigen compared to 43.6% (106/243) of samples

at KSCH. At both hospitals we found all G (G1/G2/G4/G9/G12) and major P (P[4]/[6]/[8]) genotypes, besides genotype P[11] which was found Bumetanide at AIIMS only (Fig. 1A and B). At KSCH we detected relatively high frequency of G1 (29.2%), G2 (19.8%) and G9 (32.1%) genotypes, while at AIIMS G1, G2, G9 and G12 had 19%, 15.8%, 21.2% and 21.2% detection rates, respectively. Among the G–P combinations, the common rotavirus strains at both the hospitals were G1P[8], G2P[4] and G9P[8] and in total constituted 19% and 20.7% of the total strains genotyped at AIIMS and KSCH, respectively (Fig. 1C). Among the unusual RV strains, we detected G2P[6] at KSCH only, and G9P[11] only at AIIMS. Although we found G12P[6] and G9P[4] at both hospitals, G12P[6] was more common at AIIMS (14.7%) than KSCH (1.9%) while G9P[4] was commonly found at KSCH (12.3%) than AIIMS (3.3%). We found nearly similar percentages of G and P mixes at both hospitals, however, G (15.8%) and P (25.5%) non-typeables at AIIMS were relatively more than G (4.8%) and P (13.2%) non-typeables at KSCH. The present rotavirus surveillance study (2007–2012) at AIIMS showed G12P[6], G2P[4], G9P[8] and G1P[8] to be the most prevalent strains with 14.7%, 8.7%, 5.4% and 4.9% detection rates, respectively (Fig.